<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
>

<channel>
	<title>Grizzly Groundswell &#187; Department of Defense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://grizzlygroundswell.com/tag/department-of-defense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://grizzlygroundswell.com</link>
	<description>Uniting Conservative Thought, Voice and Image across this Blessed Nation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 03:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>

<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/1.0.9" mode="advanced" entry="normal" -->
	<itunes:summary>Uniting Conservative Thought, Voice and Image across this Blessed Nation.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Grizzly Groundswell</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://grizzlygroundswell.com/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>Uniting Conservative Thought, Voice and Image across this Blessed Nation.</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>Grim News for Soldiers: Pentagon To Consider Widening Definition of &#8220;Extremist Organization&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://grizzlygroundswell.com/2009/11/23/grim-news-for-soldiers-pentagon-to-consider-widening-definition-of-extremist-organization/</link>
		<comments>http://grizzlygroundswell.com/2009/11/23/grim-news-for-soldiers-pentagon-to-consider-widening-definition-of-extremist-organization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Libz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pre-Grizzly Reformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court martial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoDD 1325.6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hasan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Napolitano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[militia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muslim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oathkeepers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politically correct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right-wing extremism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Poverty Law Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stewart Rhodes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grizzlygroundswell.com/?p=379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Major Nidal Hasan, the Pentagon is considering widening the scope of the regulations regarding the rights of soldiers to participate in "dissident and protest activities". This is grim news considering the liberal democrat who is Commander-in-Chief.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://grizzlygroundswell.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Cannon-July-16-2009-066.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-396" src="http://grizzlygroundswell.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Cannon-July-16-2009-066-150x150.jpg" alt="Rocking DC" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
<p><span style="font-family: andale mono,times"><span style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino"><strong>Thanks to Major Nidal Hasan</strong>, the Pentagon is considering widening the scope of the regulations regarding the rights of soldiers to participate in &#8220;dissident and protest activities&#8221;. This is grim news considering the liberal democrat who is Commander-in-Chief.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino">The DoD Directive 1325.6, which governs such activities, was revised in 2003 and outlines acceptable conduct for military members in this area.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino">Section 3 provides the basic guidelines to follow:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino"><strong>3. </strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>POLICY</strong></span><br />
It is DoD policy that:</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino">3.1. The Department of Defense shall <em><strong>safeguard the security of the United States.</strong></em><br />
3.2. The Service members&#8217; right of expression should be preserved to the<br />
maximum extent possible, <em><strong>consistent with good order and discipline and the national<br />
security.</strong></em><br />
3.3. <em><strong>No commander should be indifferent to conduct</strong><strong> that</strong></em>, if allowed to proceed<br />
unchecked, <em><strong>would destroy the effectiveness of his or her unit.</strong></em><br />
3.4. The proper balancing of these interests will depend largely upon the <em><strong>calm and<br />
prudent judgment of the responsible commander.</strong></em></span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino">It seems like if the Department of Defense had followed the rules that were already in place, the murder of fourteen people at Fort Hood by Hasan &#8211; a terrorist &#8211; never would have occurred in the first place. If the the commanders at Fort Hood had applied 3.1, 3.2 or 3.3, Hasan would have been subject to a court martial. However, 3.4 presupposes that the commander would exercise &#8220;prudent judgment&#8221; as a &#8220;responsible commander&#8221; and, according to 3.3, not be &#8220;indifferent to conduct that&#8230;would destroy the effectiveness of his or her unit.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino">That being said, the part of section three that should be of concern is Section 3.5, specifically 3.5.8.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino">3.5. The following guidelines be applied to principal activities that the Armed<br />
Forces have encountered:</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino">3.5.8. <strong>Prohibited Activities</strong>. Military personnel must <em><strong>reject participation in<br />
organizations that espouse supremacist causes</strong></em>; attempt to create illegal discrimination<br />
based on race, creed, color, sex, religion, or national origin; <em><strong>advocate the use of force or<br />
violence</strong></em>; or otherwise engage in efforts to deprive individuals of their civil rights.<br />
<em><strong>Active participation</strong><strong>, such as publicly demonstrating or rallying, fund raising, recruiting<br />
and training members, organizing or leading such organizations, </strong></em><em><strong>or otherwise engaging in<br />
activities in relation to such organizations or in furtherance of the objectives of such<br />
organizations that</strong></em> <em><strong>are viewed by command to be detrimental to the good order,<br />
discipline, or mission accomplishment of the unit</strong></em>, is incompatible with Military<br />
Service, and is, therefore, prohibited.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino">Janet Napolitano, according to her own DHS report, wants to monitor &#8220;right wing extremists&#8221; who oppose restrictions on firearms, lax immigration enforcement, continuing free trade agreements, same-sex marriage, one-world government, Communist regimes, policies of Obama regarding immigration, citizenship and the expansion of social programs, etc. The list continues, ad nauseum and includes the bulk of the United States military. Don&#8217;t forget that she singled out returning war veterans as being of particular concern.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino">This brings to mind groups like &#8220;Oathkeepers&#8221; who, according a report by the Southern Poverty Law Center, is &#8220;a particularly worrisome example of the Patriot revival&#8230;a newly formed group of law enforcement officers, military men and veterans&#8230;[who] vow to fulfill the oaths to the Constitution that they swore while in the military or law enforcement.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino">The news of the Pentagon&#8217;s consideration of rewriting the regulations on &#8220;dissident and protest activities&#8221; is not good, especially in light of the willingness of this administration to favor &#8220;political correctness&#8221; over the obvious truth. When you take into account Obama&#8217;s response to things that concern our men and women in uniform, i.e. Fort Hood, I don&#8217;t hold out any hope that the outcome is going to favor our soldiers.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: andale mono,times"><span style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino">I expect that the rules that should have been applied to Hasan will soon be re-written and applied with force and vigor to our dedicated and decorated soldiers, sailors and airmen. And when these heroes are court-martialed as domestic terrorists, don&#8217;t expect the lame stream media or the Obama administration to conjure up any pre-PTSD symptoms out of thin air.</span><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://grizzlygroundswell.com/2009/11/23/grim-news-for-soldiers-pentagon-to-consider-widening-definition-of-extremist-organization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
