I was listening to http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2009/11/27/scientists-square-heated-climategate-debate

Investigating the website http://www.weatheraction.com/

Which was the person arguing against global warming I found this widget to add to websites http://wattsupwiththat.com/widget/

Those who want to follow the world climate debate and have an idea of what is happening.  This I s a good tool to get an idea of Solar flux which is the main source of heat on the planet. Notice CO2 rising and temperature dropping.

I did like the argument that CO2 is great for plant growth for food.

IN addition to the widget.  Wattsupwiththat.com has a great article.  Tough reading but good explanations of how global warming is determined. It appears that much of the data is taken from Urban centers instead of ignoring the Urban centers of Concrete which does warm up and retains heat longer compared to country side.  It took  a freedom of information request to figure out this error in calculations.  This is well pointed out in this article. http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/29/when-results-go-bad/#more-13373

For those interested in more interesting articles on the  subject check out the following links.

http://www.climateaudit.org/

http://www.realclimate.org/

http://www.worldclimatereport.com/

http://icecap.us/

http://www.climatedebatedaily.com/ This site shows both sides of the argument and which group does name calling and fear mongering instead of science proof.   Lots of good links are listed on this site also.

Please pass this along.

David Anfinrud

David provides us with “RadioActiveOTR” late nights on www.WGGRN.com 1-5am CST.  David’s blog is www.RadioActiveConstitution.com

[poll id="4"]