Who Are the “Unnamed Sources” in the McCain Campaign”
As the election came to its conclusion, in the waning days, “unnamed McCain campaign members” began leaking information to the press that Sarah Plain was hurting the campaign for a variety of reasons. After last night’s defeat, the “unnamed sources” crawled out from under their collective rocks again blaming Palin for the defeat. In my view, even if true, it is dispicable for these people to take shots at Palin in anonymity.
For years, no decades, we have seen the press using unnamed insider sources to feed political stories. Notwithstanding the news media’s need to “protect” their sources, I find this contemptible. If an insider is trying to reveal information about corruption, that is one thing-though I would still come right out and use my name if it were a disclosure of corruption. But this is merely a matter of personalities, pointing the finger of blame and revenge. In this case, this is nothing more than a couple of sore losers trying to get the message out that it was “Palin’s f—in’ fault.
To me, it is a matter of principle. If you want to take a shot at someone, don’t do it anonymously. Put your name under it if you want credibility. Besides, what were these sources trying to protect-their next campaign job?
Years ago, during my DEA career, someone in our office wrote an anonymous letter to DEA HQs regarding alleged mismanagement by our bosses. One day in the office, I overheard a passing exchange between one of the managers and one of our agents (who the manager suspected might have written the letter). When the boss, asked, “You didn’t write that letter did you?”, the agent replied, “I sign all my letters.”
That has been a lesson that has guided me ever since. It is why whenever I write a blog essay or send in a comment to another blog, I always sign my name.
Those “unnamed sources” from the McCain campaign are cowards.
gary fouse
fousesquawk
You Should Also Check Out This Post:
- Will Burris be seated? Bet on it.
- The Disappointing Chicago Bears, and the b.s. is flowing
- A Conversation with A Liberal
- Game ON Grizzly Growl for Jan. 06 2009
- It is not who votes. It's who counts the votes.
More Active Posts:
- More persecution re: Proposition 8 in California (195)
- Insanity in Cali: "Vote Yes" signs stolen, death threats issued (70)
- Dear friends and family (46)
- The Maid asked for a raise (42)
- Excited and Optimistic (33)
- Dumb Laws of Illinois (33)
- BREAKING: Obama Campaign Implicated DIRECTLY in Election Fraud (20)
- SacBee: Anti-War Bias Hidden in Tale of Iraqi Girl Getting New Legs from US Army (15)
- Obama's Pastor and the "So-called State of Israel" (14)
- Club GITMO and the Supreme Court (12)












I quite agree.
Schmidt and Salter have disgraced themselves, and if he wasn’t as big a light as he is, would have tarnished John McCain.
If one is capable of reading the number tracking correctly, and Dick Morris and Karl Rove are, among others, one would see McCain’s numbers steadily climbed after Governor Palin’s selection. They continued to climb right up until rumblings of the financial implosion surfaced, and steadily, continually plummeted all through the crisis.
Perhaps Steve and Mark have lived too long within the beltway, and among the party elite too long. Perhaps they will take the advice of several, and take this as an opportunity to move back out into the real world for spell.
Sarah Palin has earned any spot, any role she so desires. I for one say thank God!