If the public understood what goes on behind the scenes in Big Tobacco, their hair would not only stand on end but there would be group hair loss! My childhood friend Connie has a heart of gold but, in all honesty, isn’t playing with a full deck! She began smoking because her husband, whom I always refer to as Big Foot, gave her a pink cigarette holder with her initials glued in the center. Connie fell so in love with the image of her smoking with the pink/rhinestone cigarette holder, that now she’s a certified chain smoker who levels out around 3-4 packs a day! No effort on my end can convince Connie that cigarettes will one day kill her. As a last ditch effort, I’m thinking of explaining to her in graphic detail, that if she continues to smoke cigarettes, the nicotine will cause her hooters to fall off when she least expects it! In any case, although her brain is still functioning at the elementary school level, her reasoning for smoking (outside of the pink rhinestone holder) is her perception of Philip Morris as the result of their sponsored advertising campaigns on television.
PM spends an inordinate amount of money devising ads that target that warm and fuzzy spot in viewers. Matter of fact, as a ritual in their morning meetings, I’m confident that the Philip Morris executives must pray to the cigarette god to please please dear nicotine god, please send our message straight to the very heart of that warm and fuzzy viewer!” Of course, PM probably spent another big hunk of cash on a warm and fuzzy demographic study to determine if the payout would equal the pay-in. Obviously, they received a heads up because the ads are lengthy and go into great detail as to how Philip Morris is so concerned about the health of “us folks” and how smoking is so harmful to your health. The shrewdness of this plan is – on the one hand, total genius if you are the devil - but marketing at it’s worst – if you are a viewer as naive as Connie whose chromosomes are at odds with one another!
Joshua Slavitt, Director of Policy and Programs for Philip Morris, is considered to be PM’s internal expert on what Big Tobacco refers to as the “ATI or Anti’s” (anti-tobacco industry) and their strategies. Part of Mr. Slavitt’s plan is to cause dissent among tobacco control groups by “enhancing internal conflicts” among them. In order to carry out this strategy, PM seeks out moderate anti-tobacco groups and works to enter into relationships with them and get them to work with Philip Morris in some cooperative capacity. Another strategy is to limit or redirect public health funding away from any tobacco control programs Philip Morris doesn’t like and direct it to programs they do like. For instance, Philip Morris approves programs that don’t harm cigarette sales (Duh!) or the image of smoking like youth education, preventing youth access, etc. They are mindful of any negative public perceptions and devise ways of getting around these negative images – thus the positive advertising on television. PM also works to stimulate financial investigations of public health groups in order to weaken them and challenge their so-called white hat image with elected officials and the media. The estimated start up cost for this program is $500,000 the first year.
Mr. Slavitt’s Anti-Tobacco Industry Plan goes something like this:
We have spent considerable time discussing the importance of developing a response to the anti’s. We like to call them the Anti-Tobacco Industry because they have the economic and political resources to deserve to be called an industry. (Is this guy the anti christ or what?)
. Today, I’d like to present you with a plan that will coordinate company and external resources to diminish the effectiveness of the anti-Tobacco Industry. (Make the good guys look real bad!)
. Our plan also seeks to moderate the ATI’s impact on the policy process so that we can reestablish our credibility through the initiatives that we are developing. (Going into the back door of government & infiltrating small anti-tobacco groups)
. After we have implemented these initiatives we must continue to keep pressure on the ATI so that we can restore and maintain balance in the political process and with the media. (Bad mouth the anti-smoking crowd aka American Cancer Society, etc as much as possible without receiving PPP (poor public perception)
. Just as importantly, we need a plan with obtainable goals and performance measurements that can be tracked over time. (Hey! I don’t want to spend a fortune on this plan and then have it bite me on the ass and drawing an unemployment check.
Attila Honey (check back this Friday for Part 2)












































FriendFeed
Twitter
LinkedIn
Digg
Youtube
Flickr
[...] More: The Philip Morris Scam to fall short anti smoking groups Part 1 … [...]
[Translate]
This is the so-called anti-christ referenced in this blog. The materials you reference are over 13 years old. I have not worked for PM since 2006 and the program you mention took place for 1 year between 1996 and 1997 and was terminated for two reasons: 1) it was deemed to be wrong to publicly criticize the public heath community on an issue they believed in so strongly and 2) it was rendered moot by the Master Settlement Agreement. So your blog post is inaccurate in a number of instances. By the way, PM was the only company to support regulation of tobacco products by the FDA, launched the We Card Initiative and has worked closely with states and retailers to keep cigarettes away from minors. PM also cannot advertise on billboards – MSA provision – and has significantly cut its magazine advertising – just name the last magazine you’ve seen with a PM product ad in it. Cigarettes are STILL LEGAL, a fact that the Public Health community ignores. If you all were so determined to make cigarettes go away then support laws to make them illegal and let’s have a public national debate on whether federal or state government should have the ability to have this responsibility. In the mean time, get you facts right. I am not a spokesperson for PM or any other tobacco company but I am tired of seeing my name and my writing taken out of context. Lying will not achieve you goals.
[Translate]
Let me add to my prior blog post. Why is it that if you are a researcher looking for a cure for a virus, cancer, diabetes, or any of a host of other major issues affecting the public health domestically or internationally, it can take months or even years to get minimal grant dollars. Yet, if you write a policy piece on why tobacco taxes should be increased or why tobacco advertising should be banned, you can get a grant from federal and state agencies and the pharmaceutical industry over night? It’s because the federal government, state governments and the pharmaceutical industry and their allies in the public health charitable community have billions of dollars to spend annually on tobacco control. Is tobacco consumption a problem in this country and others — no question. But, the issue is skewed because pharmaceutical companies can make billions of dollars annually selling smoking cessation devices — the patch, gum, inhalents, pills — that cost consumers a fortune (ever spend money on the patch? It’s not cheap). So there’s a lot of money to be made over this issue and not all of it necessarily has the health of the public in mind, but is more focused on the bottom line of other ocmpanies who are themselves lobbying behind the scenes to whip up negativity around smoking and tobacco products. Here’s another statistic: I’ve been smoking for over 25 years. All of my family members smoke or smoked. NOT ONE died from a smoking related disease. Some died of Altzheimers at 85-90+ years. Others died from Diabetes, which is an incredibly degenerative disease. Others died from poor diets and being overweight. Every year the public health community throws this number of 500,000+ deaths a year, just in the U.S., related to smoking. But they cannot justify or prove the number. It’s a statistical lie. Is smoking bad for you? Yes. Should it be kept out of the hands of minors? Absolutely. Should its use be regulated so that nonsmokers, especially young children, are not exposed to it? Of course. But who suddenly gave the public health community the right to tell me what I can do with my life, so long as I am not inflicting my choices on others? If I want to pay $8/pack to smoke (and fund highways, state infrastructure, legislative salaries and public health programs with the taxes that are generated), that’s still my choice because the product is STILL LEGAL. You want to make it illegal? Great. So just like the 55mph speed limit, overnight, people are going to become criminals — how many people actually obey speed limits despite the number of tickets being handed out? Because people will still find ways to buy cigarettes and other tobacco products. Want to support organized crime, Hezbollah, Al Qaeda? Then create a massive black market in tobacco products, just like creating a massive black market in alcohol resulted from prohibition. Just like we can’t stop the sale of ILLEGAL drugs now… Let’s put some rational thought into this debate and stop dredging up the past.
[Translate]
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by ChadTEverson: The Philip Morris Scam to destroy anti smoking groups Part 1 | Grizzly Groundswell http://ow.ly/HaWB #Grizzly Where do you Stand?…
[Translate]